1.Introduction30Classical Foundations[微笑]The theoretical implications of this approach towards the body can be clarified further by exploring how it is based upon a version of what I shall refer to as corporeal realism.There is a long tradition of writings on realist philosophy and scientific method, a tradition which constitutes an influential (if internally differentiated) trend in the social sciences and which has been developed recently by Roy Bhaskar and others into forms of critical realism (for excellent introductions to key debates regarding realism, see Keat and Urry, 1982; Sayer, 2000). Some of these realist works have tended to marginalize the body, but if we take seriously the implications key realist principles have for the analysis of embodiment it is possible to explicate the central features of a corporeal realist approach towards the body–society relationship as outlined in the convergence thesis. In what follows, then, I am not concerned with engaging with the philosophical complexities of realism, or even with outlining here the full range of implications that realism could have for an analysis of the body, but with isolating in the briefest and simplest of terms its central features.4 My reason for doing this is to help formalize and extend what is of value in the convergence thesis outlined above, and to provide a framework for the substantive studies that follow later in this study.