4月25日亚太雅思大作文音频解析

题目：

In manycountries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units,rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negativetrend?

题目大意：

现在很多国家的城市里的人们选择独居或组成很小的家庭以取代庞大家庭群体而生活，这是一个积极还是消极的发展？

思路：

是否积极或消极依据不同的个人情况有所不同。

积极方面：对于某些人来说，小的家庭群体和独居自由度更大，因为不需要顾及太多人的共同生活习惯而安排整体的生活和家庭习惯传统，因而得以机动性调整不同的生活状态和计划，这尤其适合于当今城市中人们弹性而多变的工作和生活状态。并且在这种相对与其它家庭关系独立而连带关系较小的情况下，人们可以节省很多精力成本，因为不需要花费时间和精力来去维系稳定而长久的家庭裙带关系，对于很多现代忙碌于工作和学习中的人们来说，这样可以高效而简洁化家庭的运营。

消极方面：更小而点状的家庭群集有时会很难保证平稳而规律的家庭生活，因为独自或更少的人来运营一个家庭则意味着人们自己或有限的家庭成员需要有更充裕的时间精力和更全面的能力来维持和满足家庭生活中的各种问题和要求，而这意味着很多城市中家庭生活能力不够的人来说一旦某些突发状况出现在某个成员身上则家庭的运营便会出现紊乱。同时孤立状态下的个体或简易的家庭结构也很大程度上意味着更高的生活成本，因为这意味着个体或有限的家庭成员来负担相对独立的生活资源（诸如住房，昂贵的电器等）而不能与他人共享，无形之间增加了城市人口的生活的压力。

关键词：

Peoplein city 题目给定人群特性，则更多应从城市生活，城市人口特性等方面来考虑问题。

livealone or in small family units.尽量将独居和微小家庭结构同时涵盖。

rather than in large, extended family groups所有的优劣势都要与大家庭进行对比考虑

提纲：

是否积极或消极依据不同的个人情况有所不同。

积极方面

自由度更大，尤其适合于当今城市中人们弹性而多变的工作和生活状态

节省很多精力成本，对于很多现代忙碌于工作和学习中的人们来说，这样可以高效而简洁化家庭的运营

消极方面

有时会很难保证平稳而规律的家庭生活。

更高的生活成本，无形之间增加了城市人口的生活的压力。

MODEL

Before scrutinizingwhether living independently or inside a limited family range would bring aboutoutweighing benefits or problems compared with the life in an extendedcommunity, one must first define the parameters so as to have a system ofdifferentiation; development may appear diversely in individual lives.

Indeed, positivesemerge when one chooses to live alone or starts a family with a small range ofmembers, especially in the modern urban life, where persons are increasinglylacking of time and energy to maintain a traditional and relatively stableliving. That is to say, solitaries, or nuclear families definitely enjoy morefreedom than the great family groups; they are designing and arranging theirfamily livings dynamically based on their own purposes (or at most theircouples’ and children’s) without caring about other dependents or closerelatives. Fitness of this living style, ergo, is manifest among urbanresidents who are occupied always in their ever-changing living, socializingand working conditions. It is also a saving of vigor that no complicated familyties are binding persons living on their own or in small families: no need forone to concern about whether one should be closer or relatively distant on formingtheir relations with a relative; no pressure or guilty is sensed if one wantsto be indolent so as to do nothing after going back home. Energy and time aretherefore used more reasonably for people devoting more into their careers or studiesin today’s city on what they should focus more on.

Situations sometimes go adversely, however,if solitude or minute family structure is adopted instead of kinship ones bythose without well-rounded abilities to manage the real-life details or strugglingwith life under financial burdens. Flexibility of a family life may alsoprovoke instability and irregularity to the members—they somewhat need toacquire more capabilities to face problems and to undertake more ventures whenthere are only restricted holders within a domestic environment. Disorders aremore likely to happen in this circumstance once there is emergency; noadditional one would help to deal with issues overwhelming the whole family. Economicpressures may also prevail when fewer individuals have to weave everything intothe fabrics of the entire household. Notwithstanding lower costs that areinvolved in feeding the members, increased expenditures on ranging from housingto instruments，which are far higher than consumptionson daily intakes, necessarily needed in the daily routines mostly are coveredsolely by a particular person of couple, rather than shared by distributed usersunder a sharing roof; hardships may even overmatch happiness among dwellers inhighly evolving cities.

In conclusion, I would very much agree thatthe balance of edges and weaknesses are highly recommended by integratingindividual properties and visual angles in dialectically seeing the currentfamily life; situations vary greatly between people chasing for family maneuverabilitytogether with simpler interpersonal relations and the one hardly handling theirlives or caring more about monetary family operation.

相关词汇：

Scrutinize 认真审视

Parameter 决定因素

Solitary 独居者

Nuclear family 小家庭

Dynamically 机动地

Dependent 亲属

Ergo 因此

Vigor 精力

Bind 绑定

Indolent 懒惰

Solitude 独居的

Domestic environment 家庭环境

Disorder 紊乱

Prevail 成为主要问题

Expenditure 花销

Overmatch 超过

Dweller 城市居住者

Dialectically 辨证地

Maneuverability 机动性

以上解析及音频均由上海环球教育写作名师王硕实老师提供，转载请联系小助手~更多雅思写作解析欢迎关注公众号雅思情报圈

添加小助手雅思滚滚（微信号：yuangungun-go）备注暗号“喜马拉雅”即可免费获取17-18年雅思写作机经完整版~